Pipeline '05
10 Drugs, 8 Companies, ONE Goal
| Drug
Name |
Company |
Phase
I |
Phase
II |
Phase
III |
NDA
Filed:
Awaiting FDA Action |
| 1 |
Panitumumab (panitumumab) |
Amgen |
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
Avastin (bevacizumab) |
Genentech |
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
Tarceva (erlotinib HCL) |
Genentech |
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
Advexin (INGN 201 – p53) |
Introgen |
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
BAY 43-9006 (sorafenib) |
Bayer |
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
Nelarabine (nelarabine) |
GlaxoSmithKline |
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
Xinlay (atrasentan) |
Abbott Laboratories |
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
Palifermin (palifermin) |
Amgen |
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
Temsirolimus (temsirolimus) |
Wyeth |
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
Femara (letrozole) |
Novartis |
|
|
|
|
Over the years, the oncologist’s role
in the management of cancer has evolved considerably, not only
in terms of the drugs and technologies that he or she employs,
but also in the goals toward which those tools are put to use.
In the specialty’s earliest years, when cancer was at once
a mystery and a certain death sentence, an oncologist could at
best hope to alleviate some of the pain associated with the condition,
and perhaps afford the afflicted patient a few extra weeks of
productive life. In time, an increased understanding of the pathophysiology
of cancer made it possible to slow or even reverse tumor development
and extend survival by months or even years, albeit at the cost
of some extremely unpleasant side effects.
Today, the armamentarium of the oncologist
is more diverse than ever, and the aims of the profession accordingly
more ambitious. Investigators are seeking ways to provide clinical
benefit equal to or greater than that possible in years past,
but associated with less toxicity, fewer and less severe side
effects, and the preservation of healthy cells adjacent to tumor
cells. Moreover, technology has advanced to the point where researchers
are able to tackle forms of cancer refractory to previous treatment,
or very advanced cancer that would, not so many years ago, have
been beyond the reach of medical science. We profile 10 of the
more intriguing cancer drugs on their way down the pipeline;
they represent only a portion of the remarkable products likely
to reach the market in the years to come.
Product
Name (Generic): Avastin (bevacizumab)
Manufacturer: Genentech, Inc.
(www.gene.com)
Indication: Renal cell carcinoma,
advanced NSCLC, breast cancer, pancreatic cancer
Current Status: Phase III |
Notes: Avastin,
which inhibits tumor angiogenesis via action against
vascular endothelial growth factor, has been established
as safe and effective in the management of metastatic
colorectal cancer (in conjunction with chemotherapy);
it was approved in February 2004 by the FDA to treat
this condition. Genentech, the maker of Avastin, is now
evaluating the drug in the treatment of other forms of
cancer.
Key Research: Phase
III trials are underway testing Avastin against renal
cell carcinoma, advanced NSCLC, metastatic breast cancer,
and metastatic and locally advanced pancreatic cancer,
including investigations of the drug in combination with
a variety of other treatment options.
The Company Line: www.gene.com/gene/pipeline/status/oncology/avastin
Current Clinical Trials:
Visit www.clinicaltrials.gov
|
Product
Name (Generic): Tarceva (erlotinib HCL); also
known by experimental name OSI-774
Manufacturer: Genentech, Inc.
(www.gene.com)
Indication: Advanced NSCLC, Pancreatic
Cancer (PC)
Current Status: Awaiting FDA Approval
(Phase III for PC) |
Notes: In
the third quarter of 2004, Genentech—in collaboration
with OSI Pharmaceuticals and Roche—filed a New
Drug Application (NDA) with the FDA for Tarceva, which
targets the epidermal growth factor receptor. The drug
appears to be an extremely promising treatment for non-small
cell lung cancer; a September 22 article on Forbes.com
states that the drug has “blockbuster potential” and
quotes a Banc of America Securities estimate suggesting
that the FDA may approve Tarceva in the latter half of
2005.
Key Research: A review
published in the June 15, 2004, issue of Clinical Cancer
Research noted that treatment with Tarceva was associated
with a response rate of 12% and 40% one-year survival
when used to treat NSCLC in phase II trials; the phase
II response rate of bronchoalveolar carcinoma was more
than 25%. Researchers suffered a setback in October of
2003, when results from a pair of phase III studies—TRIBUTE,
the US arm of the study, and TALENT, the European arm—indicated
that the use of Tarceva did not translate into clinical
benefit. However, a subsequent, pivotal phase III trial—the
results of which were presented at ASCO ’04—found
that Tarceva effected a 42% improvement in median survival
and a 45% improvement in one-year survival when compared
to placebo in a population of 731 previously-treated
patients with relapsed NSCLC.
The Company Line: www.gene.com/gene/pipeline/status/oncology/tarceva
Current Clinical Trials:
There are more than 40 trials involving Tarceva listed on Clinical
Trials.gov, including five trials that were not yet enrolling
patients at the time of this writing. For more information, visit www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/search?term=tarceva&submit=Search.
|
Product
Name (Generic): Advexin
(INGN 201 – p53); also listed as Ad5CMV-p53
Manufacturer: Introgen Therapeutics
(www.introgen.com)
Indication: Head and neck cancer
Current Status: Phase III |
Notes: With
its lead product, Advexin, Introgen is likely to become
the first pharmaceutical company to receive approval
for a medication that falls under the heading of “tumor
suppressor therapy.” Advexin is a low-toxicity
genetic therapy; its active ingredient is the p53 tumor
suppressor gene, which kills cancer cells or stops tumor
growth via an adenoviral delivery system without harming
normal cells.
Key Research: At the
time of this writing, more than 600 patients have received
more than 4,000 doses of Advexin in the 20 studies (involving
eight different cancer types) conducted to date. Data
from two earlier, phase II studies assessing Advexin
as monotherapy demonstrated that patients treated with
Advexin experienced an 88% improvement in median survival
time and experienced tumor stabilization or shrinkage
in nearly three quarters of all cases. Advexin appears
to be well tolerated to an almost unprecedented degree
for a cancer therapy. Physicians and patients with questions
about clinical trial enrollment are encouraged to e-mail
clinicaltrials@introgen.com for more information.
The Company Line: “We
believe that our administration of proteins in the form
of biopharmaceuticals with a short half-life, using genes
that do not integrate into the patient’s genome
and are rapidly cleared from the body after administration,
is an emerging field that presents a new approach for
treating many cancers without the toxic side effects
common to traditional therapies,” says Channing
Burke, Director of Communications, Introgen Therapeutics.
We will be initiating the marketing application [for
Advexin] in 2004, and we expect it to take about a year
to complete this. We project that Advexin might be on
the market in 2005-2006.”
Current Clinical Trials:
Cancer.gov lists four trials for Advexin at www.cancer.gov.
|
Product Name
(Generic): BAY 43-9006 (sorafenib)
Manufacturer: Bayer Corporation/Onyx
Pharmaceuticals (www.bayer.com; www.onyx-pharm.com)
Indication: Kidney Cancer
Current Status: Phase III |
Notes: This
product is designed to control kidney cancer by impeding
both tumor angiogenesis and the proliferation of cancerous
cells (by inhibition of RAF kinase and VEGFR/PDGFR, respectively).
On April 5, 2004, Bayer announced that the FDA had granted “Fast
Track” status to BAY 43-9006, which will allow
the pharmaceutical company to submit data to the FDA
on a rolling basis as it is acquired, speeding the overall
review and approval process.
Key Research: Phase
II investigations have yielded compelling results. One
study, led by Mark Ratain, MD, Professor of Medicine
and Associate Director for Clinical Sciences at the Cancer
Research Center of the University of Chicago, assessed
89 patients with renal cell carcinoma. Interim data reported
at this year’s ASCO annual meeting suggest that
nearly one half of patients treated with BAY 43-9006
experienced tumor shrinkage of greater than 25%, and
13 of at least 50%. Almost 90% of those showing some
response were progression-free after six months. Bayer
is in the process of enrolling up to 884 patients for
a large-scale, phase III trial (TARGETS) that will assess
the efficacy and safety of BAY 43-9006 as an addition
to best supportive care for kidney cancer.
The Company Line: “The use of BAY 43-9006 in patients with
renal cell carcinoma has resulted in a high level of durable disease
stabilization or tumor shrinkage. I am excited about the potential
it may offer in the fight against this form of kidney cancer,” says
Dr. Ratain (www.onyx-pharm.com/products/bay_43_9006.html).
Current Clinical Trials:
Phase
II Multicenter Uncontrolled Trial of Bay 43-9006 in
Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Phase
II Randomized Study of BAY 43-9006 in Patients With
Refractory Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
BAY
43-9006 in Patients With Imatinib Mesylate-Resistant
Chronic Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia
Phase
II Trial of BAY 43-9006 in Metastatic, Androgen-Independent
Prostate Cancer
Phase
III Randomized Study of BAY 43-9006 in Patients With
Unresectable and/or Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer
|
Product Name
(Generic): Nelarabine (nelarabine); also known
by experimental name 506U78
Manufacturer: GlaxoSmithKline
(www.gsk.com)
Indication: Childhood T-cell leukemia
Current Status: Phase III |
Notes: GlaxoSmithKline
plans to complete its submission of a New Drug Application
for nelarabine to the FDA under the Fast Track designation
sometime in the fourth quarter of 2004. The drug is a part
of the antimetabolite family; more specifically, it is
a nucleoside analogue that inhibits DNA synthesis. This
effect is especially pronounced when nelarabine interacts
with T-cells; accordingly, Glaxo is targeting relapsed
or refractory childhood T-cell malignancies with the medication.
Key Research: The
phase II study principally responsible for nelarabine’s
Fast Track designation enrolled 153 patients with refractory
or relapsed T-cell leukemia, all under the age of 21.
Response rates to nelarabine were 53% among patients
refractory to initial therapy or experiencing first relapse
and 26% among patients experiencing second or subsequent
relapse or who were refractory to multiple therapies;
23 patients experienced complete remission.
The Company Line: http://science.gsk.com/pipeline/index.htm
Current Clinical Trials:
Combination
Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
506U78
in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory T-Cell Acute
Lymphoblastic Leukemia or T-Cell Lymphoblastic Lymphoma
|
Product Name
(Generic): Xinlay (atrasentan)
Manufacturer: Abbott Laboratories
(www.abbott.com)
Indication: Prostate cancer
Current Status: Phase III |
Notes: The
autocrine endothelin protein is an important mediator of
cell proliferation; if a cell’s receptor to this
protein is blocked, it will not divide. Xinlay—renamed
in June of this year by manufacturer Abbott, which also
announced plans to submit a marketing application to the
FDA before year’s end—is composed of very small
molecules that insert themselves into this receptor in
cancer cells. The end result is the slowing or prevention
of tumor growth (and attendant pain).
Key Research: At present,
most available research on Xinlay relates to its impact
on hormone refractory prostate cancer. Two multinational
phase II studies were conducted in 2001, establishing
that patients receiving Xinlay (then called atrasentan)
experienced longer time-to-disease progression than patients
treated with placebo (196 days and 129 days, respectively).
Subjective assessments of quality of life were also improved
in the Xinlay groups. Phase III clinical trials are underway,
both focusing on hormone refractory prostate cancer (two
different studies will evaluate the metastatic and nonmetastatic
forms of the disease).
The Company Line:
www.hormonerefractorypca.org/atrasentan.htm
Current Clinical Trials:
Atrasentan
in Patients With Hormone-Naive Prostate Cancer Who
Are Exhibiting Early Signs of Biochemical Failure
Atrasentan
in Patients With Locally Recurrent or Metastatic Renal
Cell Carcinoma
|
Product
Name (Generic): Palifermin (palifermin)
Manufacturer: Amgen Inc. (www.amgen.com)
Indication: Chemotherapy and
radiotherapy-induced mucositis
Current Status: Pursuing FDA
Approval |
Notes: This
recombinant human keratinocyte growth factor is designed
to “protect the epithelial cells lining the mouth
and gut from damage caused by chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy.” Amgen
hopes the drug will help the approximately 400,000 individuals
in the United States who suffer from oral mucositis as
a result of cancer treatment.
Key Research: Amgen submitted a Biologics License Application
(BLA) to the FDA on June 24 of this year; approval is pending,
but as the drug is being considered under the Administration’s “Fast
Track” program, its review should be relatively swift. The
phase III investigation serving as the
basis for this submission found that treatment with palifermin
reduced the incidence of ulcerative oral mucositis and of severe
oral mucositis among patients undergoing chemotherapy (with or
without adjuvant radiotherapy), with an adverse event rate similar
to that found with placebo.
The Company Line: www.amgen.com/rnd/pipeline.html#Palifermin
Current Clinical Trials:
Pharmacokinetic
Study of Palifermin in Subjects Receiving Radiation
Therapy and Chemotherapy Followed by Blood Stem Cell
Support
|
Product Name
(Generic): Temsirolimus (temsirolimus); also known
by experimental name CCI-779
Manufacturer: Wyeth (www.wyeth-pharmaceutical.com)
Indication: Renal cell carcinoma,
breast cancer, mantle cell lymphoma
Current Status: Phase III |
Notes: Temsirolimus
is a novel agent that “inhibits mTOR-driven cell
proliferation.” In simpler terms, temsirolimus blocks
the action of the enzyme rapamycin kinase, which helps
regulate the life cycle of all cells, thus preventing mitosis.
In August 2004, the FDA granted a “Fast Track” designation
to temsirolimus for the first-line treatment of advanced
renal cell carcinoma; the drug was already being reviewed
under the “Fast Track” label for the management
of renal cell carcinoma that has failed initial therapy.
Temsirolimus is considered an especially important potential
weapon in the arsenal of the oncologist, as current methods
of treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma are generally
insufficient to prolong survival in most patients.
Key Research: Phase
II trials indicated that treatment with temsirolimus
engendered an impressive response rate of 7% among patients
with advanced renal cell carcinoma who had largely exhausted
other therapeutic options; this data prompted the FDA’s
decision to grant the drug Fast Track status as a first-line
therapy and caused a shift in Wyeth’s approach
to the development of the drug (below).
The Company Line: “After
the phase II study we decided to change the development
strategy to pursue first-line therapy in advanced RCC
patients,” says Gary L. Stiles, MD, FACC, Chief
Medical Officer, Executive Vice President, Wyeth Pharma-
ceuticals. “Currently a phase III study comparing temsirolimus
alone, interferon alpha alone, and temsirolimus with interferon
alpha [and survival as the primary endpoint] is underway.” www.wyeth.com/research/pipeline.asp#Immunology/Oncology
Current Clinical Trials:
ClinicalTrials.gov features 14 listings for temsirolimus/CCI-779,
for more information, visit www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/search?term=CCI-779
|
Product
Name (Generic): Femara (letrozole)
Manufacturer: Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Corporation (www.novartis.com)
Indication: Early breast cancer
Current Status: FDA Priority
Review |
Notes: At
present, standard adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer
employs tamoxifen, a regimen that affords no additional
benefit to the patient after approximately five years.
Since breast cancer recurrence is relatively frequent in
the period following the completion of tamoxifen therapy,
a way to continue adjuvant therapy, perhaps with a different
agent, would be of tremendous value. On June 29 of this
year, the FDA began priority review of Femara for a new
indication: the extended adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal
early breast cancer following the conclusion of tamoxifen
treatment.
Key Research: In the
November 6, 2003, issue of the New England Journal of
Medicine, a team of investigators led by Paul E. Goss,
MD, published interim results from a study testing the
impact of five years of Femara treatment following five
years of tamoxifen treatment on disease-free survival
in
5,187 women with postmenopausal breast cancer. At the first interim
analysis, the four-year disease-free survival rates were 92% and
87% among women treated with Femara and placebo, respectively.
The results of this trial, the landmark MI-17 study, were positive
enough that its monitoring committee recommended immediate discontinuation
of the placebo arm of the study, and were the basis for the FDA’s
decision to grant Priority Review to Femara.
The Company Line: www.pharma.us.novartis.com/newsroom/pressReleases/
releaseDetail.jsp?PRID=1324
Current Clinical Trials:
There are six Femara trials listed on ClinicalTrials.gov. Visit www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/search?term=femara&submit=Search for
more information
|
Back to Top
|